TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
I don't notice any difference in performance between my 17-inch
late-2011 MacBook Pro and the 15-inch mid-2014 MacBook Pro I have from
work. GeekBench doesn't see a big difference, either: 3172 / 9769 vs.
3899 / 12821.
The main difference I notice between the two is that I have to keep an
eye on the disk space on the work Mac, since it has only 250GB. A lot
of the software I test is bloated, so I have to offload things like
ISOs and VirtualBox images to an external drive. The 1TB drive on my
own Mac is only half full, and if I needed more space and/or higher
throughput I could upgrade to a larger drive and/or an SSD.
What I could really use is a fiber Internet connection.
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 6:19 PM, <dick -at- rlhamilton -dot- net> wrote:
> ... Unfortunately, the newest ones appear to be impossible to upgrade yourself (Iâd really like to be proven wrong on that point), and the upgradable ones are several years behind in terms of processors. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Visit TechWhirl for the latest on content technology, content strategy and content development | http://techwhirl.com