Re: Ig Nobel documentation
I realise it is not Friday, but today is the day this came to my attention. The winner of the Literature section of the Ig Nobel awards for Improbable Research (https://www.improbable.com/ig/winners/) seems very valid to us technical communicators.^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
https://academic.oup.com/iwc/article/28/1/27/2363584.
I especially liked the reverse engineering of RTFM.
Visit TechWhirl for the latest on content technology, content strategy and content development | https://techwhirl.com
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-
To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and info.
Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at http://techwhirl.com
Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives
Follow-Ups:
- Re: Ig Nobel documentation, Gene Kim-Eng
- Re: Ig Nobel documentation, Jonathan Baker
References:
Ig Nobel documentation: From: Sion Lane
Previous by Author:
Keeping screen shots of responsive web product more uniform
Next by Author:
Re: Ig Nobel documentation
Previous by Thread:
Ig Nobel documentation
Next by Thread:
Re: Ig Nobel documentation
Search our Technical Writing Archives & Magazine
Visit TechWhirl's Other Sites
Sponsored Ads