RE: Standards: Few & long vs. many & short

Subject: RE: Standards: Few & long vs. many & short
From: Chris Despopoulos <despopoulos_chriss -at- yahoo -dot- com>
To: "techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Wed, 5 May 2021 07:18:58 +0000 (UTC)

The only thing I would add is, be sure to work with management on the best categories to chunk by. Put together a proof of concept, but be clear that you want to chunk the standards by categories that work for the standards authorities. Otherwise I would say of course, you should chunk things up. You should also consider delivering an online version with search and navigation!
Visit TechWhirl for the latest on content technology, content strategy and content development |


You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @

Next by Author: RE: Standards: Few & long vs. many & short
Previous by Thread: RE: Standards: Few & long vs. many & short

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads