Re: TECHWR-L Digest, Vol 205, Issue 1

Subject: Re: TECHWR-L Digest, Vol 205, Issue 1
From: Syed Zaeem Hosain <Syed -dot- Hosain -at- aeris -dot- net>
To: "Hocutt, Daniel" <dhocutt -at- richmond -dot- edu>, "techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2023 21:06:37 +0000

Thanks, Daniel.

I don't need collaboration for the purpose I have for Scrivener (and you are right that it does not have that option), so this is great feedback.

I am planning a basic article about my memories of a college fraternity brother who passed last year, so want to just get my thoughts down using a basic outline and structure it into a chronological document later for sending to others.

Seems like Scrivener is well suited for this ... I could use Word too, I suppose, but the Scrivener "price is right" for me to just go for it!

Regards,

Z

I used Scrivener as a repository for research that I conducted for doctoral coursework and dissertation. It works well to collect annotated texts and to group and tag them according to any schema you'd like to apply, and it made writing the dissertation much easier because all of my research, including annotated PDFs, was housed in a single location. I drafted my dissertation in Scrivener as well, and found it a useful, if sometimes quirky, writing tool. The key benefit to me is the ability to write natural prose (rather than markup) and output that prose in a wide variety of formats. Once drafted, I output the dissertation project into Word as required by my university, then proceeded to complete the manuscript with its formatting in Word. But drafting in Scrivener made it so much easier to hone in on specific areas of the dissertation without the horror of scrolling pages and pages in a single Word document.

I'm a fan of Scrivener and believe it meets the needs of many different writing tasks. The one drawback is the inability to collaborate in the tool. Most of my writing now is collaborative, and Scrivener isn't an option for that. At least, not that I've discovered.

Good luck!
Daniel


Daniel L. Hocutt, PhD
Web Manager | Adjunct Professor
School of Professional & Continuing Studies
University of Richmond, Virginia USA
dhocutt -at- richmond -dot- edu
Technical Editor, ACM SIGDOC Proceedings <https://us01.l.antigena.com/l/ZdER1OfkaqIj9nRc2vd2pfIjaZdCaVYCXWe4is9mA5ryLwbbJqjacNhrwJL4yNaXgrbQcPBxhcjxYfYH~iqxypGE5kU0tEPaaY-e8lD8cfW3qvM7zTYFqj-lrNTMd8Ck5FNROv7-KXZqdrzErs9W4L2iqI >
Research Member, Digital Life Institute <https://us01.l.antigena.com/l/jZ37xCWkKdZ6aG364yAo4rai5nDNgZwdZ6VZknRcPdVP6BgfOjqE1ggsVghsFy6XfhL2OXqiYNXPSoMGzhdtaCvstIKr0YikzqiAasU3l6mxAxujCAnGi~xuk0LcKPLwPk >





ïOn 3/2/23, 1:55 AM, "techwr-l-bounces+dhocutt=richmond -dot- edu -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com <mailto:richmond -dot- edu -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com> on behalf of techwr-l-request -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com <mailto:techwr-l-request -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>" <techwr-l-bounces+dhocutt=richmond -dot- edu -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com <mailto:richmond -dot- edu -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com> on behalf of techwr-l-request -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com <mailto:techwr-l-request -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>> wrote:


External Email: Use caution in opening links, attachments, and buying gift cards.




Send TECHWR-L mailing list submissions to
techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com <mailto:techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>


To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/listinfo/techwr-l <http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/listinfo/techwr-l>
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
techwr-l-request -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com <mailto:techwr-l-request -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>


You can reach the person managing the list at
techwr-l-owner -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com <mailto:techwr-l-owner -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>


When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of TECHWR-L digest..."




^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^


Visit TechWhirl for the latest on content technology, content strategy and content development | http://techwhirl.com <http://techwhirl.com>


^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^








Today's Topics:


1. Could people comment on Scrivener? (Syed Zaeem Hosain)
2. Re: Could people comment on Scrivener? (Jim Jones)




----------------------------------------------------------------------


Message: 1
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2023 02:26:51 +0000
From: Syed Zaeem Hosain <Syed -dot- Hosain -at- aeris -dot- net <mailto:Syed -dot- Hosain -at- aeris -dot- net>>
To: "techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com <mailto:techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com <mailto:techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>>
Subject: Could people comment on Scrivener?
Message-ID:
<BYAPR18MB298305A86F6265F69DA07046F0B29 -at- BYAPR18MB2983 -dot- namprd18 -dot- prod -dot- outlook -dot- com <mailto:BYAPR18MB298305A86F6265F69DA07046F0B29 -at- BYAPR18MB2983 -dot- namprd18 -dot- prod -dot- outlook -dot- com>>


Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"


Have people used Scrivener to write and can comment on how you liked or disliked it?


I am looking for a tool where I can:




1. Create a basic outline of the sections I want in the book.
2. Write the text of the sections - in relatively random order - and then combine and organize them together.
3. Create a PDF output of the final book.


From what I can tell, Scrivener fits the bill pretty inexpensively. My initial writing will not be long books, of course.


And, yes, I am willing to have a bit of a learning curve (which seems to be what some reviews are saying) to get familiar with it.


Comments - pros and cons? I trust people here far more than the random reviews I have read so far! ?


Thanks!


Z


------------------------------


Message: 2
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2023 21:25:30 -0600
From: Jim Jones <han4yu3 -at- gmail -dot- com <mailto:han4yu3 -at- gmail -dot- com>>
To: Syed Zaeem Hosain <Syed -dot- Hosain -at- aeris -dot- net <mailto:Syed -dot- Hosain -at- aeris -dot- net>>
Cc: "techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com <mailto:techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com <mailto:techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>>
Subject: Re: Could people comment on Scrivener?
Message-ID:
<CAOnY3iebtc1BD6fB_=0psRTiO=d_LF8maHBq-8P+=jUh+ZbH=g -at- mail -dot- gmail -dot- com <mailto:g -at- mail -dot- gmail -dot- com>>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"


Because of my screenwriting activities, I have used it, and I like it. I
still will use it.


A couple of years ago I took a very useful screenwriting course and
Scrivener was a recommended tool for the course.


It was easy to learn.


My impression was that Scrivener could easily be adapted to use for other
things. Books, for example, and not just scripts.


Jim Jones


AB and MA in Linguistics


LinkedIn.com/in/jimxlat




On Wednesday, March 1, 2023, Syed Zaeem Hosain <Syed -dot- Hosain -at- aeris -dot- net <mailto:Syed -dot- Hosain -at- aeris -dot- net>>
wrote:


> Have people used Scrivener to write and can comment on how you liked or
> disliked it?
>
> I am looking for a tool where I can:
>
>
> 1. Create a basic outline of the sections I want in the book.
> 2. Write the text of the sections - in relatively random order - and
> then combine and organize them together.
> 3. Create a PDF output of the final book.
>
> From what I can tell, Scrivener fits the bill pretty inexpensively. My
> initial writing will not be long books, of course.
>
> And, yes, I am willing to have a bit of a learning curve (which seems to
> be what some reviews are saying) to get familiar with it.
>
> Comments - pros and cons? I trust people here far more than the random
> reviews I have read so far! ?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Z
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Visit TechWhirl for the latest on content technology, content strategy and
> content development | https://techwhirl.com <https://techwhirl.com>
>
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as han4yu3 -at- gmail -dot- com <mailto:han4yu3 -at- gmail -dot- com>.
>
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to
> techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com <mailto:techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
>
>
> Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com <mailto:admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com>. Visit
> http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ <http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/> for more resources and
> info.
>
> Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online
> magazine at http://techwhirl.com <http://techwhirl.com>
>
> Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public
> email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives <http://techwr-l.com/archives>
>




------------------------------


_______________________________________________
You are currently subscribed to
TECHWR-L.
To unsubscribe send a blank email to
http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/listinfo/techwr-l <http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/listinfo/techwr-l>
Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com <mailto:admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com>.


Visit
http://www.techwhirl.com/ <http://www.techwhirl.com/> for more resources and info.


Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives <http://techwr-l.com/archives>


End of TECHWR-L Digest, Vol 205, Issue 1
****************************************



^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Visit TechWhirl for the latest on content technology, content strategy and content development | https://techwhirl.com

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as Syed -dot- Hosain -at- aeris -dot- net -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com


Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at http://techwhirl.com

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Visit TechWhirl for the latest on content technology, content strategy and content development | https://techwhirl.com

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com


Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at http://techwhirl.com

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives


References:
Re: TECHWR-L Digest, Vol 205, Issue 1: From: Hocutt, Daniel

Previous by Author: Re: Could people comment on Scrivener?
Next by Author: Website assistance
Previous by Thread: Re: TECHWR-L Digest, Vol 205, Issue 1
Next by Thread: Re: Copyright infringement


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads