Aw: Re: I'm Just Curious. What Do You Think?

Subject: Aw: Re: I'm Just Curious. What Do You Think?
From: Nina Barzgaran <e -dot- dickinson -at- gmx -dot- net>
To: debora ames <deboraames -at- hotmail -dot- com>
Date: Thu, 25 May 2023 13:16:24 +0200

Hello Debora,

I can only agree to Laurie's post: I wonder what you really need to
solve:
I understood you to say that it is a choice and decision to take
between two solutions to be implemented ? :
* email answering service
* help portal + context-sensitive help
OR
So it seems: You already ARE doing the email answers, but are supposed
to do the portal as well.
Some people in your environment saying that the emails could/should be
stopped for - pushing that portal?

IF I was facing this exactly the same way, I would decide based on
effort vs benefit:
* emailing keeps customers + does take little time, while 'doing' the
portal just as fast: Stay with it.
* emailing takes quite some time AND keeps the portal from advancing:
Stop it.

My personal experience is rather varied, really. That's why I refer to
the basic principle more; the situation you describe is well-known
almost anywhere I worked:
You need to serve customers. Using an older technology (such as mail).
You need to do your everyday work, which is documentation...
You need to implement new technology to be up-to-date with latest
technology standards.

And find the time for all of it.

IF someone takes fault with your emailing, make it short and plain and
clear, with a few *numbers* how many customers you can serve in a
little time - while pursuing everything else easily and successfully.

Numbers, 'short and sweet' and - true - are usually the best argument
for anything in business you do - or want to... :)

Kind regards
Nina


Gesendet: Donnerstag, 25. Mai 2023 um 07:45 Uhr
Von: "debora ames" <deboraames -at- hotmail -dot- com>
An: "Laurie Marshall" <lauriejmarshall -at- att -dot- net>,
techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Betreff: Re: I'm Just Curious. What Do You Think?
Hi, Laurie. The problem is the manager doesn't want users to be
referred
to the full helpset, because the plan is to eventually get all of the
help
onto a digital platform where the help will be shown on top of the UI
in
the form of flows, brief articles, tooltips, beacons...which can be
done
immediately; and "additional info" (conceptual, background, related,
cross-referenced) one can reach via links inside the articles. So, even
though some may see that Help link, others may not because even though
it's been suggested to move it to the top of the UI, it hasn't been
done.
Based on what I see in survey results for users who want more help, I
had
suggested that, until the details they are looking for are added to the
platform, I would take it upon myself to send them a short email with
Here's your answer, along with a screenshot of where it is, via that
Help
link at the bottom of the UI. Then, if they reach out for more info, I
can
say Click that Help link, then this topic. That answer is step 6. And
by
the way, we'll soon have that help set you see integrated directly into
the UI in some form. Until then, if you need anything else, this is
where
the full helpset is. A few minutes, at the most. I did it at my last
job
when approached by Client/Professional Services, 'cause there was no CS
department, just me. And it worked. Soon those questions stopped,
'cause
word spread that the documentation was worth looking it.
I'm not Customer Service where I am. I'm the writer who wrote the help,
so
I know where all the details are. So, I merely suggested doing this as
a
favor, to help some customers out until we get everything onto the
platform. Although it has come down from the top that everyone, no
matter
what their role is, should make more effort to "go beyond the norm to
reach out to our customers", the decision maker would rather ignore my
suggestion, don't tell them about that Help link, and just have
everybody
wait until all info gets on the platform. So, of course, those
customers
who voiced their need are going to desert our signature app and go to a
competitor's.
So, I just wondered what other tech writers (who possibly face
situations
of their own), thought.
________________________________
From: Laurie Marshall <lauriejmarshall -at- att -dot- net>
Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2023 5:32 PM
To: debora ames <deboraames -at- hotmail -dot- com>
Subject: Re: I'm Just Curious. What Do You Think?
Hi Debra,
Is it possible to include an instruction within your procedure that
tells
users to click the help link if they need more info? Perhaps a
screenshot
pointing out the (very small) help link at the bottom of the UI? This
might prompt some users to be self sufficient and check the help for
more
info. If they don't find what they're looking for, then they could take
the next step and initiate an email. It's not a perfect solution, but
perhaps a middle point?
I'm not sure I fully understand your situation - so this suggestion
might
not be applicable.
Laurie
On Saturday, May 20, 2023 at 01:47:00 PM EDT, debora ames
<deboraames -at- hotmail -dot- com> wrote:
Hi, Nina. This is not really using up resources to implement a
solution.
This is merely me, reviewing survey results, seeing a customer's
particular problem, and reaching out to them ('cause we also pull their
email addresses), and saying This is your answer--and all I show them
is
that answer (10 minutes). If they came back and asked Where are the
instructions this step is in?, I'd say It's step 6 on pg. 22 of "Set Up
Billing Alerts" (2 minutes).
On my prior job, although there was a Customer Service department,
Professional Services shot me these types of questions all the time for
customers who wanted an immediate answer. It resulted in more customers
reading the documentation, Engineering starting to use it to write test
case; and Client Services told me they closed a few big deals based OK,
now we want to see the documentation.
Regarding everything you wrote, where I am now, we are doing all of
that.
But because our new VP, Product Management also wants us, as
individuals,
to take more initiative by going "outside the box" to connect to our
customers, this takes no time at all on my part to help them out--
because
I know where everything is stated (until it gets on the platform). It's
just a small favor that takes minutes, helps them out, and prevents
them
from quitting the app. Since it works, I would think the other side
would
say Sure, doesn't hurt ('cause I'm volunteering to do this), instead of
leaving these (potentially long-term) customers hanging (or gone) until
we
get all of the information on the platform six or more months from now.
________________________________
From: Nina Barzgaran <e -dot- dickinson -at- gmx -dot- net<mailto:e -dot- dickinson -at- gmx -dot- net>>
Sent: Saturday, May 20, 2023 4:24 AM
To: debora ames <deboraames -at- hotmail -dot- com<mailto:deboraames -at- hotmail -dot- com>>
Cc: TechWhirl
<techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com<mailto:techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>>
Subject: Aw: I'm Just Curious. What Do You Think?
Sounds not too easy to solve in two clicks... :)
I think basically it's about cost vs benefit - for the company, your
team
especially, rather all concerned, including the developers. So, here a
few
questions that might make it easier to clear the dust of the battle..
* If you start implementing the email solution and not go that soon for
the platform, how many customers would be affected?
* Have you seen numbers actually decreasing because of that helpset not
being right there, a few clicks away...?
* How much time does it take to implement that email solution?
* How much longer would it take to get the platform up and running, if
you do the emails first?
How many people would be involved and possibly be kept from other
imoprtant tasks - that is - would those tasks 'suffer' and be finished
later?
Again: What's the least cost with the highest possible (long-term)
effect.
I think, losing a few non-paying-customers now when you can retain so
many
more prospects and existing subscribers might be worth the risk.
Just my two cents worth.
Best of luck
Nina
Gesendet: Samstag, 20. Mai 2023 um 06:05 Uhr
Von: "debora ames"
<deboraames -at- hotmail -dot- com<mailto:deboraames -at- hotmail -dot- com>>
An: "TechWhirl"
<techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com<mailto:techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>>
Betreff: I'm Just Curious. What Do You Think?
Hello, my peers. There's a debate within the Doc team. We have a
digital-adoption platform on which floats a signature application with
some high-level flows and tooltips; and access to brief articles in the
Help center. The flows are rather You can do this here instead of a
more
focused This is how you do it. Half of our surveyed customers can
easily
intuit what to do; the other half seeks more info (What does this
mean?, I
assumed I could do this...; More training, please, Need more
instructions).
Before obtaining the platform, I was tasked to create a full help set
(in
Madcap's Flare). So, I created detailed instructions and clearly
marked-and captioned screenshots (as directed by the product managers)
of
the entire application. And I'm a conversational writer, so it's really
easy to understand (plus I user-test, then write). However, this
helpset
info hasn't yet been moved to the platform in the form of videos,
knowledge bases, HTML pages, PDFs, micro content...all the forms it can
be
added to the platform. It'll be about 4-6 months to get that done, when
given the OK to start.
BTW, this helpset can be accessed via a Help link (about 8pt. Arial) at
the bottom edge of the UI. (if you squinch, you may see it). But, this
is
the difference of opinions:
* One opinion is: For those customers who want those answers, don't
just tell them Click the link. Make it simple, and send them a quick
email
stating This is what you're looking for..., shows a screenshot of step
6.
(or steps 6-8!) of ABC procedure, and also includes those clearly
marked-and-captioned screenshots. IF they contact you and want to know
more, say Click that Help link at the bottom of your screen, then "ABC"
topic in the TOC you'll immediately see. Then say, Eventually, we'll
have
all that information added to the platform. But, in the meantime, you
can
find any other info you need, if you want, in that helpset.
* The other is: Why bother with that when we're gonna eventually get
everything onto the platform? Don't you know we're aiming for "Out with
the old and in with the NEW?!" Tired of hearing about it. Get with the
program!
Since our customer base are
legal/medical/governmental/regulatory/regular
folks online-faxing documents that need to be signed and returned in a
timely manner--and the very real company goal is to retain and increase
this base for ROI-proven reasons (so you don't want them to get
frustrated
and cancel out of the initial free, or paid, subscription), what do you
think? (I'm of opinion #1, 'cause on a prior job at a company that
developed contract-management software for commercial real-estate
enterprises, Client/Professional Services would come to me with those
same
questions from particular customers who would call in 'cause they
couldn't
find or figure something out. I would send that exact email to the rep,
who would forward it immediately to the customer. Greatly! appreciated
by
all.)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Visit TechWhirl for the latest on content technology, content strategy
and
content development | [1]https://techwhirl.com
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as
e -dot- dickinson -at- gmx -dot- net -dot- <mailto:e -dot- dickinson -at- gmx -dot- net -dot- >
To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com<mailto:techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot-
com
>
Send administrative questions to
admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- <mailto:admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- > Visit
[2]http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources
and
info.
Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our
online
magazine at [3]http://techwhirl.com
Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public
email archives @ [4]http://techwr-l.com/archives
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Visit TechWhirl for the latest on content technology, content strategy
and
content development | [5]https://techwhirl.com
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as
lauriejmarshall -at- att -dot- net -dot- <mailto:lauriejmarshall -at- att -dot- net -dot- >
To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com<mailto:techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot-
com
>
Send administrative questions to
admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- <mailto:admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- > Visit
[6]http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources
and
info.
Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our
online
magazine at [7]http://techwhirl.com
Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public
email archives @ [8]http://techwr-l.com/archives
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Visit TechWhirl for the latest on content technology, content strategy
and
content development | [9]https://techwhirl.com
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as e -dot- dickinson -at- gmx -dot- net -dot-
To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
[10]http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more
resources and
info.
Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our
online
magazine at [11]http://techwhirl.com
Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public
email archives @ [12]http://techwr-l.com/archives

References

1. https://techwhirl.com/
2. http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/
3. http://techwhirl.com/
4. http://techwr-l.com/archives
5. https://techwhirl.com/
6. http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/
7. http://techwhirl.com/
8. http://techwr-l.com/archives
9. https://techwhirl.com/
10. http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/
11. http://techwhirl.com/
12. http://techwr-l.com/archives
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Visit TechWhirl for the latest on content technology, content strategy and content development | https://techwhirl.com

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com


Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at http://techwhirl.com

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives


Previous by Author: Aw: Re: I'm Just Curious. What Do You Think?
Next by Author: Aw: RE: [External] Re: I'm Just Curious. What Do You Think?
Previous by Thread: Aw: RE: [External] Re: I'm Just Curious. What Do You Think?
Next by Thread: The Gerund


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads