Re: Aw: Re: AI-based writing assistants
The issue isn't that it can (or might, in the future) write well. It's "what" it is writing. I would not trust it on technical material unless I knew it had been trained on equivalent material, and even then, the fact checking it would require would probably negate any time-saving benefits.
If they ever figure out how to have it do fact checking on what it produces, then I might trust it.
--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Visit TechWhirl for the latest on content technology, content strategy and content development | https://techwhirl.com
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-
To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and info.
Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at http://techwhirl.com
Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives
References:
Re: Aw: Re: AI-based writing assistants: From: Keith Soltys
Previous by Author:
Re: Aw: Re: AI-based writing assistants
Next by Author:
Wisi: Turn Notion Wiki into Documentation!
Previous by Thread:
Re: Aw: Re: AI-based writing assistants
Next by Thread:
Re: Alt text on HTML tables
Search our Technical Writing Archives & Magazine
Visit TechWhirl's Other Sites
Sponsored Ads