TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: no-smoking or non-smoking From:Len Olszewski <saslpo -at- UNX -dot- SAS -dot- COM> Date:Fri, 4 Mar 1994 12:50:32 -0500
Matthew Wong asks:
> I'm writing a manual that requires me to address a hotel room in which the
> guest is not permitted to smoke. Now, should I address this room as:
> (a) non-smoking room or (b) no-smoking room.
[...]
Actually, either modifier describes the required behavior of the room's
occupants, and not any intrinsic quality of the room itself. I prefer
the modifier "smoke-free", which *does* describe the room.
However, if you can only choose between the two you've mentioned, use
"non-smoking". IMHO, the idea of "smoking" vs. "non-smoking" areas in
general is part of regular usage these days, the appropriateness of the
modifiers notwithstanding.
|Len Olszewski, Technical Writer | "The fish." |
|saslpo -at- unx -dot- sas -dot- com|Cary, NC, USA| -Salvador Dali |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Opinions this ludicrous are mine. Reasonable opinions will cost you.|