TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
> Mark Levinson <mark%CRABAPPLE -dot- BITNET -at- concert -dot- net> writes:
>> Without exception, following a brief period of glazed-over eyes,
>> they thank me for this information and *change their programming.*
>>
>> ** Terrific. I would love to get rid of that word. (As my
>> co-writer said, "What do we show on the icon, a coat-hanger?")
>> So please, what synonym do the programmers accept?
> Why not "stop"?
"stop" has a particular meaning to many computer programmers,
usually implying that the process stopped can be resumed. Of course,
this is always a problem with writing about computer programs, since
programming has co-opted a heck of a lot of terminology... It doesn't
pay to be overly concerned about it (unless you're writing to a
programmer audience) but I find that in situations, using a phrase
is usually better than using a word. For example, "Give up?" or "Stop
trying?", etc.
Most of these one-word responses are probably abbreviations of
such phrases, with the remainder implied. Typical of programmer-
designed prompts and messages (not necessarily bad, but designed for a
different audience - for programmers :-).