Re: Richard's "Resume length" comments

Subject: Re: Richard's "Resume length" comments
From: Patrick O'Connell <patricko -at- EICON -dot- COM>
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 1994 10:38:00 PDT

Flesh peddlers? I think I know what Richard means by this -- I believe I
know of one or two outfits here in Montreal who would fit the bill -- but
I'm still curious.

And, for the record, I believe a one-pager, plus perhaps a separate page
listing recent projects, is still a good bet.

Pat
.-------------------------------------------------------------------.
|\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\
||\-----------------------------.-------------------------------------.
|\| Patrick Brian O'Connell ! Intermediate Writer,Eicon Technology|
.|| These are my opinions, not ! Corporation / (B) 514-631-9825 x2250|
\| Eicon Technology's. ! Net:patricko -at- eicon -dot- com |
'-----------------------------'-------------------------------------'



>>Date: Mon, 17 Oct 1994 21:49:07 -0700
>>From: Richard Mateosian <srm -at- C2 -dot- ORG>
>>Subject: Resume length
>>
>>>On a related note: what's the current trend on resume length? Last I
heard,
>>>length was not in the doghouse anymore
>>
>>Hiring managers like them short, but flesh peddlers like them long. ...RM
>>
>>Richard Mateosian Technical Writer in Berkeley CA srm -at- c2 -dot- org
>>
>>------------------------------
>>
>>End of TECHWR-L Digest - 16 Oct 1994 to 17 Oct 1994
>>***************************************************
>>


Previous by Author: Just a l'il test post
Next by Author: Resume tip from a man who knows
Previous by Thread: Usability Testing -- Our Experience
Next by Thread: Signature


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads