Re: TOC for Two Volumes

Subject: Re: TOC for Two Volumes
From: Bill Burns <WBURNS -at- VAX -dot- MICRON -dot- COM>
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 1995 10:51:16 MDT


My personal preference is to have a table of contents in each
volume. I find that identical TOCs in multivolume works tend
to be more confusing than helpful. A single TOC in Volume I and
continuous pagination would also create some confusion. (Note that
journals using continuous pagination still include separate TOCs.)

Bill Burns

"Denuone Latine Loquebar?" (Henricus Barbatus)

Previous by Author: Re: Articles with Acronyms
Next by Author: Re: SGML Temp. Job (RTP, NC)
Previous by Thread: TOC for Two Volumes
Next by Thread: Re: TOC for Two Volumes

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads