TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:warningisms From:Tom Little <LITTLE_TOM_H -at- OFVAX -dot- LANL -dot- GOV> Date:Thu, 12 Jan 1995 11:02:00 MDT
from Ian White:
> As I understand it, there is at least an informal heirarchy of terms
> for safety notices in user manuals, something like:
> CAUTION This could produce unwanted results, or damage data or equipment
> WARNING This could cause personal injury (or do severe damage to data
> or equipment?)
> DANGER This could kill a human being or cause serious injury.
This is similar to what we do here, except that we don't use DANGER, and WARNING
must be harm to people or the environment.
Ideally, the definitions should prevent both the overuse and the underuse of
cautions/warnings. In practice, both problems continue.
Tom Tadfor Little | "They called me
Technical Writer/Editor | 'the quiet one' because
Los Alamos National Laboratory | I just didn't have anything
little_tom_h -at- ofvax -dot- lanl -dot- gov | to say" -- George Harrison, 1987.