TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
CogitoTS -at- AOL -dot- COM
<<Wouldn't it be handy if all messages had clear subject lines,
including designations such as <ADV> for advertising messages, <???>
for inquiries, <*%!!> for flames and polemic ranting, <$$> for job
postings. With all the professionals on this list, I'm sure we can
come up with additional categories and abbreviations.>>
Hear, hear! It's difficult to keep up with the volume of mail in this
area without some sort of presorting. I propose that we come up with a
list of such "icons" and start using it. Since "cogitot" proposed the
idea, would s/he be willing to compile a list of suggestions, post
them here for feedback, and then make them available as a FAQ document
for this mailing list? For those who are graphically challenged (me,
for instance), at least use just a simple keyword at the beginning of
the "subject" area... this would help greatly. (Less cryptic and
subjective than icons too.) Here are a few suggestions to follow up on
cogitot's icons (for discussion, revision and perhaps adoption):
Proposal: Hey guys and gals, I'd like you to consider doing the
following
Advert: I want to sell something
Flame: Someone ticked me off
Help-me: I need a question answered
Help-you: Here's my advice
Job: position wanted/available
Spam: I need someone to talk to, doesn't matter about what
etc.
One other note: using tabloid-style headlines for the subject line of
messages makes a whole lot of sense. Simply repeating the original
title (prefaced by "re.:" doesn't help those of us who don't have
newsreaders or other means of following message threads.