Re: Equal pay for equal work

Subject: Re: Equal pay for equal work
From: Marc Santacroce <santa -at- TFS -dot- COM>
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 1995 10:07:22 -0800

At 7:52 AM 6/13/95, Richard Mateosian wrote:
>>Assume, for example, a candidate is making $32k, and that the job
>>opening I have has a salary range of $30,000 to $49,500. My goal may
>>be not to exceed the range's midpoint of $39,900. Even that, however,
>>would be more than a 20% increase for this candidate (and my HR
>>rep would kill me

>When I managed programmers in the 1960s and 1970s we tried to AVOID taking
>advantage of people who had been underpaid in the past. We looked at what we
>were asking them to do and how well we thought they could do it, and we paid
>them accordingly. Everyone doing approximately the same job got
>approximately the same pay.

>Often (particularly for women and minorities) this meant we wound up paying
>new hires a lot more than they had been paid in prior jobs. ...RM

>Richard Mateosian VP, STC Berkeley Chapter
>Freelance Technical Writer srm -at- c2 -dot- org Review Editor, IEEE Micro
================
Yeah, but you're a good guy...!

=======================

M_a_r_c_ A. _S_a_n_t_a_c_r_o_c_e_________________________
Technical Writer/Trainer TRW Financial Systems, Inc.
300 Lakeside Dr. Oakland, CA 94612-3540
(510) 645-3469 (W) (510) 944-9814 (H)
santa -at- tfs -dot- com (W) santacroce -at- aol -dot- com (H)

"An idiot with a computer is a better, faster idiot!"


Previous by Author: Re: To Any Writers In the Room
Next by Author: Re: Netherlands tech. commun. society
Previous by Thread: Re: Equal pay for equal work
Next by Thread: In Reply to Salary History Comments


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads