NON-DELIVERY of: Why Interleaf?

Subject: NON-DELIVERY of: Why Interleaf?
From: Lotus -dot- M -dot- a -dot- i -dot- l -dot- Exchange -at- TESSPO-VA -dot- SMTRW -dot- LANGATE -dot- SPRINT -dot- COM
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 1995 07:46:00 -0400

--sQy1EKFCqoGLlGUQrHON2tHzkdWaNF18
Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"


Delivery Failure Report

Your document:
Why Interleaf?
could not be delivered to:
Ronni Perry -at- CRWMS at DL-Notes -at- DL_CCMAIL
because:
MailEx0010: cc:Mail user name too long.
Routing path:
DLLN2,DLLN2,DLLN2,DLLN2


________________________




--sQy1EKFCqoGLlGUQrHON2tHzkdWaNF18
Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

RFC-822-Headers:
Comments: To: TECHWR-L -at- VM1 -dot- UCC -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU

--sQy1EKFCqoGLlGUQrHON2tHzkdWaNF18
Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

I've read lots of articles comparing between Interleaf and FrameMaker.
I have both and wonder why anyone would use Interleaf.
Employments ads require Frame over Interleaf about ten to one.

In short, what can Interleaf do that FrameMaker 5 cannot do?

Bob Morrisette
writer -at- sabu -dot- EBay -dot- Sun -dot- COM

--sQy1EKFCqoGLlGUQrHON2tHzkdWaNF18--


Previous by Author: NON-DELIVERY of: Printer Software
Next by Author: NON-DELIVERY of: Re: Humor, Dr. Suess
Previous by Thread: NON-DELIVERY of: Communication--800 #s depleted
Next by Thread: NON-DELIVERY of: Re: Humor, Dr. Suess


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads