TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Re. Summary and thanks From:Beverly Parks <bparks -at- HUACHUCA-EMH1 -dot- ARMY -dot- MIL> Date:Tue, 18 Jul 1995 08:12:23 MST
The following were follow-on comments to the discussion/summary
about section/paragraph numbering. Yes, I know there is no
attribution:
>> As you can see, I'm unconvinced, but some of these points
>> are worthy of more discussion. I _can_ be persuaded. Any
>> more comments, details, rebuttals, clarifications, etc.?
> Just a couple more points:
> There probably aren't enough fonts and styles to make my
> headers unique at so many levels.
I hope someone wouldn't actually *do* this. Different font sizes
for headers is okay, to an extent. But to change the font or
style for each header level is not only excessive, but
amateurish. (If the comment was meant as a joke, I apologize for
being a bit slow. :)
=*= Beverly Parks =*= bparks -at- huachuca-emh1 -dot- army -dot- mil =*=
=*= "Unless otherwise stated, all comments are my own. =*=
=*= I am not representing my employer in any way." =*=
