Re: hideous grammar [2]

Subject: Re: hideous grammar [2]
From: Nora Merhar <MERHAR -at- ALENA -dot- BITNET>
Date: Thu, 3 Aug 1995 08:43:53 CDT

Paul,

It was always my understanding that "Charles'" was the possessive form, not the
plural form (as in "That's Charles' underwear."). I would still vote for
"Charleses" as the plural form.

Nora
merhar -at- edsvcs -dot- switch -dot- rockwell -dot- com

> When I went to school Charleses was spelled Charles' and was pronounced the
> same way the name is pronounced in the singular. I wasn't aware that this
> convention had been changed.
> regards
> Paul


Previous by Author: Re: hideous grammar
Next by Author: Fluffy Writers
Previous by Thread: Re: hideous grammar [2]
Next by Thread: Re: hideous grammar [2]


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads