TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Gender biais From:Loren Castro <lfc -at- SOL -dot- CHINALAKE -dot- NAVY -dot- MIL> Date:Fri, 4 Aug 1995 14:35:32 -0700
> A couple of weeks ago, in a column of the Gazette (Montreal) devoted to
> language, the author suggests that if there are enough people who use "it"
> instead of "he or she" or "he/she", the practice will eventually be
> adopted by everyone.
> Does anyone have any opinion about the proposed solution?
"He or she" is barely tolerable and tedious. "He/she" and "s/he" are
abominable. "It" seems silly, but we say "it" when referring to a baby. It
all reduces to, as somebody already suggested, "s/h/it."
Why don't we convene the equivalent of a constitutional convention and create a
word for a gender-free singular personal pronoun and be done with it? I
nominate the STC to lead the effort and at the same time settle all the other
vexing problems that we quibble over. I see that the Council of Biology
Editors has decreed that commas and periods shall go outside the quotation
marks British style. Good for them. Come on, gang, let's put on a show--no,
no, no--let's create a group to settle all this business. Any volunteers?
Don't look at me. I follow rules; I don't create them.
lfc -at- sol -dot- chinalake -dot- navy -dot- mil
(Looking more and more toward those mountains.)