Re: Help my sentence... please

Subject: Re: Help my sentence... please
From: Gina <psu02909 -at- ODIN -dot- CC -dot- PDX -dot- EDU>
Date: Mon, 7 Aug 1995 13:56:33 -0700

On Mon, 7 Aug 1995, Betsy Maaks wrote:

> On Thu, 3 Aug 1995 15:46:26 , you wrote:

> >The user manual I'm editing has this sentence:
> >
> >
> >In addition, the framis requires a thingy to have been developed, using the
> >whatsis tool, that contains whoosies to be used in the whizbang.
> >
> >(It's the framis that contains the whoosies, and the whoosies that are being
> >used in the whizbang.)
> >
> >Help!
> >
> >TIA
> >Stacey Kahn
> >SKahn -at- wb -dot- com

How 'bout: In addition, the framis requires a thingy to have been
developed, which in turn uses the whatsis tool that contains whoosies
used in the whizbang.
Nadia


> > > >
> This is what Dilbert's Alice called "multi-topic sentenced." The cure is to
> make "short, stubby ones" that contain only one topic. It reads like you
> have five items here. Pick one to talk about, namely the MAIN topic. Then go
> to the next:

> "The FRAMIS

> The framis is a ___. It is used for ____. It requires a thingy (footnote
> here?). It contains whoosies.

> (Footnote?) The thingy is a ___. It is developed using a whatsis tool.

> Whoosies are ___. They are also used in the whizbang.

> The WHIZBANG

> The whizbang is a ___. It is used for ____. It requires whoozies (see above)."

> Now, your sentence doesn't say what you explained between parentheses. In
> the first place, what does the whizbang have to do with the framis? What you
> are telling me--that the Whoosies have two purposes: the framis and the
> whizbang? Is this the real main idea?

> Also, the verb tense "to have been developed" is awkward, because it puts
> the developed thingy as a prerequisite to the creation of the framis. First
> you develop the thingy, then you use it in the framis.

> Think "short and stubby." Also try to remain chronological, putting first
> things first. And third, focus on the main topic. You don't have to explain
> everything exhaustively in one sentence. Rather, explain the main topic,
> which may be the pieces of the whole (i.e., the five items), and then
> explain each one, followed by the interconnections between them.

> KIS!

> Betsy Maaks
> ****************************************************************
> Betsy Maaks + Frame Technology Corp.
> 312-266-3208 + Advanced Products
> bmaaks -at- frame -dot- com + 441 W. Huron Street
> + Chicago, IL 60610

> ****************************************************************


Previous by Author: Orange County STC 1995 Publications Competition
Next by Author: Re: vt100
Previous by Thread: Help my sentence... please
Next by Thread: Re: Help my sentence... please


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads