TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: "May" vs. "Can" From:Ken Gross <candk -at- HOOKED -dot- NET> Date:Sat, 12 Aug 1995 23:03:18 -0700
On 12 Aug 1995, Sue Heim wrote:
> Hey folks! I need your collective opinion...
> How do you feel about using "may" or "can" in docs and marketing
> collaterals. For example, I really don't like the following sentence
> (this is from a brochure of ours):
I vote for "can."
> "Author reprint request cards may be generated, and references can be
> output in a variety of formats."
This is the MOST passive sentence I've ever read! It screams for a "you
can" or at least a "one can!"
> Unfortunately, our marketing stuff is done by committee, and although
This last contains the operative word: marketing!! My condolences.
