TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: couple of questions From:Kris Olberg <KJOlberg -at- AOL -dot- COM> Date:Wed, 8 Nov 1995 13:46:38 -0500
In a message dated 95-11-07 00:22:34 EST, janeb -at- IADFW -dot- NET (Jane Bergen)
writes:
>We're under fire at work. Suddenly our boss thinks that tech writers
>ought to be able to read C and do telephony scripting using C
>commands. He says that he and the president of our company think that
>"most tech writers ought to be capable of this." Is this true?
No. As a rule, most tech writers are not programmers also. Do you know the
motivation for this? Is the company short of resources?
>I have seen books like "Teach Yourself C in 21 days" --- has anyone
>tried this and how helpful was it? I'm willing to buy the book with
>the thought that I might at least become knowledgeable about C,
>though I do not entertain any thoughts of becoming a C programmer.
You can certainly try. No one can say for sure whether you can or cannot
successfully learn enough about C in a short amount of time to apply it. But
beware! Programming is a skill of logic and precision. Some people are
naturals at programming, and some people will never understand it. I wouldn't
commit to anything with your boss until you have a better feel for whether
you can learn enough to apply it successfully.