TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Sickness of the hyphen From:wburns -at- MICRON -dot- COM Date:Wed, 15 Nov 1995 09:26:36 MDT
Barclay says:
>They way I remember how to use hyphens is that they connect the words
>before a noun (adjectives or other nouns used as adjectives) that
>modify each other, not the noun. (Huh?)
I don't think so. Compound modifiers work together to modify a noun.
They don't modify the noun separately (as in your first example). In some
cases a noun and a modifying adjective compose the compound, so it may seem
that the first modifies the second which modifies the third. I tend to listen
to the primary stress in compounds. Often only one primary stress occurs in a
compound modifier. In your example, if it had two primary stresses (light'
blue' car) it would clearly not be a compound and should be separated by
commas to clarify the meaning. If a single primary stress occurs (light' blue
car), then it's clearly a compound modifier.
This method doesn't work in all cases, and it doesn't explain why compound
modifiers are hyphenated when they follow (a practice with which I
disagree). What I find irritating is the common misconception that prefixes
like "pre" and "post" need to be hyphenated.
Bill Burns *
Assm. Technical Writer/Editor * LIBERTY, n. One of imagination's most
Micron Technology, Inc. * precious possessions.
Boise, ID *
WBURNS -at- VAX -dot- MICRON -dot- COM * Ambrose Bierce