TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: State of the art From:"Huber, Mike" <Mike -dot- Huber -at- SOFTWARE -dot- ROCKWELL -dot- COM> Date:Thu, 30 Nov 1995 15:01:34 -0500
Too hackneyed for what?
It's OK for cheap ad copy, but meaningless for technical work
and kind of passi for cool ads.
----------
From: goodhue[SMTP:goodhue -at- SMTPGATE -dot- DISCLOSURE -dot- COM]
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 1995 12:38 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list TEC
Subject: State of the art
Call for Neologism:
The term "state of the art" has been used for some time to refer to
the highest level of development. In your opinion, is it hackneyed?
I posed the question once to an STC PIC a while ago and one member
suggested: "Bleeding edge." This may be too bloody for many. I
considered " the fore-running cusp" for a softer sound, but neither
terms seem adequate to me. They just don't have the ring of an
engineering feat. I've also run across "state of the edge," but
it's
a mere substitution of one word for another. Any suggestions
welcomed.
