TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: State of the art From:John Gear <catalyst -at- PACIFIER -dot- COM> Date:Fri, 1 Dec 1995 10:07:00 PST
>Date: Thu, 30 Nov 1995 10:13:50 EST
>From: Scott Goodhue <goodhue -at- SMTPGATE -dot- DISCLOSURE -dot- COM>
>Subject: State of the art
> Call for Neologism:
> The term "state of the art" has been used for some time to refer to
> the highest level of development. In your opinion, is it hackneyed?
> I posed the question once to an STC PIC a while ago and one member
> suggested: "Bleeding edge." This may be too bloody for many. I
> considered " the fore-running cusp" for a softer sound, but neither
> terms seem adequate to me. They just don't have the ring of an
> engineering feat. I've also run across "state of the edge," but it's
> a mere substitution of one word for another. Any suggestions
> welcomed.
1. Yes, IMO it is hackneyed. Very.
2. Bleeding edge is appropriate for Wired magazine maybe--I can't think of
other places
3. State of the edge????? Are we discussing swords or razors?
4. Suggestions: Best available technology, best commercially-available
technology etc.
I don't like the sound of them much but they do tell me something
whereas the marketing folks have rendered "state of the art" meaningless.
John Gear (catalyst -at- pacifier -dot- com)
The Bill of Rights--The Original Contract with America
Accept no substitutes. Beware of imitations. Insist on the genuine articles.
