TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
In line with guild certification, et al, I recently
have been amused | :-( by solicitations for tws to submit
n number of samples with their resume.
Let's say I work as part of a tw team -- several writers and one
or two editors, a graphics person, and a compositor.
Onto the interviewer's desk go copies of a document I wrote ...
with a little help from my friends to korekt my speling and
make my grammer gooder.
Perhaps I create mil-spec manuals under the control of some
(S)CDRL or TMCR that controls nearly every keystroke. Are the
manuals tossed on the reviewer's desk really mine?
Well, I've been a tw for n decades, I ought'a know something.
If I stayed in one shop all those years, I might only know what
the shop requires. (Good writers of all varieties tend to be
mobile. That does NOT mean stationary writers are necessarily
poor writers.)
Suggested solution:
Part 1: Prepare a proofreading test. Include mispelings and both
gross and picayunish grammatical errors (your call as to big and
little) -- do you follow Fowler or Harvard/Chicago?
-- %
have recently been vs. recently have been
hammers, nails and screws vs. hammers, nails, and screws
-- %
Part 2: Have the candidate write something ... my preference is
an extended outline for a product I describe. Don't be too
critical if the organization is wrong (not every manual has
INSTALL as the last chapter).
Part 3: If the candidate claims knowledge of the tools available,
let the candidate do Part 2 on those tools.
I'm not too certain how this could be accomplished remotely.
Perhaps allowing a specific time period to accomplish an
assignment? (Your thoughts, please.)
Bottom line: Before you ask for, or submit, resumes, consider
their value. TWs also might ask who will review the samples;
an HR person, the supervisor-to-be, or an experienced tw.
johnfglenn -at- aol -dot- com
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Post Message: TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU
Get Commands: LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU with "help" in body.
Unsubscribe: LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU with "signoff TECHWR-L"
Listowner: ejray -at- ionet -dot- net