Re: Signal-to-noise on techwr-l

Subject: Re: Signal-to-noise on techwr-l
From: Robert Plamondon <robert -at- PLAMONDON -dot- COM>
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 1996 20:05:55 PDT

Stuart Burnfield critiques:

>>Robert Plamondon said:
>>
>> ^
>> T |
>> R | /
>> I | /
>> V | /
>> I | /
>> A | /
>> L | /
>> I | /
>> T | /
>> Y |/
>> +--------------->
>> NUMBER OF POSTINGS

>This is an excellent first approximation, but the full function should
>show the (inverse) relationship between the amount of sense in the
>posting, and the length of the sig plus the amount of included material.

Feel free to post your chart at any time.

-- Robert


Previous by Author: Re: obsession with degrees
Next by Author: Re: Guest octothorpes in phone numbers
Previous by Thread: US-TX-Dallas Technical Writers Needed For Contract
Next by Thread: Re: Looking for Copyright info


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads