TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Writing vs. ??? TECHNICAL writing From:Stuart Burnfield <slb -at- FS -dot- COM -dot- AU> Date:Sun, 6 Oct 1996 16:34:40 +0800
I read the posts in favour of grammar and usage threads on techwr, and
they make good theoretical sense. Then I recall the grammar and usage
threads we actually get, and. . .
There is rarely a right answer to these brain-teasers. There are usually
wrong or incomplete answers, and these *always* get posted, confidently,
triumphantly, every time.
The signal-to-noise ratio in these threads is astonishingly low,
considering this is a list aimed at working writers.
After all the right and wrong answers, the best, the most useful answer,
is the one that says "find some references you respect and use them".
Look up the easy stuff in books and let's discuss the hard stuff.
It's indisputable that good writing is a prerequisite for good technical
writing, but writing should be the ground on which we stand, not the fog
through which we. . . well, I'm still working on that metaphor.
End of whinge.
(Now, where are the contact details for that fascinating Romanian
engineering conference. . .)
Regards
---
Stuart "the short-sigged one" Burnfield (slb -at- fs -dot- com -dot- au)
