TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Estimating Windows Help From:"NIVA Inc." <niva -at- MAGI -dot- COM> Date:Thu, 10 Oct 1996 13:33:42 -0400
Leslie McKendry-Smith wrote, in part:
-->What figure do you use to estimate the effort to convert a printed manual to
-->Windows Help. I'm looking for a figure in hours or minutes per topic?
Hi Leslie:
Your post raises two issues, one philosophical and one quantifiable. The
philosophical issue concerns how/if a hardcopy manual converts to
on-line format. From the sounds of your quandry, it may be that the
other quotes referred to by your client are simply to "electrify" the paper
document, not create a true on-line document out of it. This is a huge
problem in our business, because many people do not realize the basic
difference between paper and on-line documentation, in its construction,
organization, wording, intent, and use. Your client may need a little
education in this regard, to appreciate the scope of the task.
That being said, I usually approach an on-line help project by considering
that any existing paper-based documentation is there for reference only
(and possibly some use of text, but I assume they have our firm in there
in the first place because the documentation they have isn't suiting their
purposes, so probably isn't written all that well). So, I look at the application
to determine three things:
1. How many procedures will the user conduct with the application; that
is, how many high-level functions (e.g., check inventory, hire a new
employee, estimate a construction job, etc.).
2. How many screens does the application have.
3. How many fields does the application have.
Having learned that, I then run a little formula that says:
<n> overview topics, at 100 words each = <n100> words
<n> procedural topics, at 150 words each = <n150> words
<n> screen topics, at 75 words each = <n75> words
<n> field topics at 40 words each = <n40> words
Then, we have a total number of words to be written. All that's left is to
figure out how many words it is possible to write, process, format, QA,
etc. in a day. (For a first draft, I use 7 pages [250 words each]/day for
writing, plus various algorithms for WP, DTP, graphics, QA, etc.). Having
done that, toss on a per diem rate and do the math.
BUT, it is then important to remember that creating on-line help is
NOT simply writing, because you also have to build links, do the
help programming, etc. Assuming you have a good Windows help
creation tool (we use ForeHelp; like it a lot), the programming is no more
difficult than desktop publishing, so doesn't add a lot of burden to the
process. Building links and such does take a little time, though, so I
usually add about 10 - 15% at the end of the day, just for good measure.
The key to all of this, I think, is to help your client understand the scope
of the effort, and the quality of the product you intend to deliver to them.
Convince them of the value of the overview/procedure/screen/field
approach (assuming you agree with it yourself), and they will soon see
that the resulting context-sensitive, hierarchical, self-referenceable help
file will be well worth the initial expense.
I hope this is helpful.
John Collins
Group Manager
NIVA Inc.
"Canada's Leading Documentation Firm"
mail -at- niva -dot- com http://www.niva.com