TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Thanks! RE: Documentation Plan From:Misti Tucker <mdelaney -at- SOFTWARE-SERVICES -dot- COM> Date:Thu, 17 Oct 1996 15:35:52 -0400
To everyone who sent me ideas for things to include in a document plan,
thank you! I've integrated almost all of the ideas and have quite a
comprehensive out line now!
Technical Consultant/ Communication Specialist
Software Services Corporation
Ann Arbor, Michigan (800) 448-1568
*******************************************************************
My opinions do not in any way represent those of my employer.
>----------
>From: Anne Halsey[SMTP:AHalsey -at- SystemOne -dot- net]
>Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 1996 2:17 PM
>To: Misti Tucker; TECHWR-L
>Subject: RE: Documentation Plan
>Misti recently asked what belongs in a document
>plan.
>What I recommend is doing a mental review
>of every doc project you've been involved with, focusing
>on those things which caused you mental or physical
>pain, caused delays in deliverables, added expense,
>or generally made your life hell. Then write your doc
>plan to anticipate and minimize the impact of the
>various evilnesses.
>I typically include the following:
>*A brief, accurate description of the product to be
> documented.
>*A brief description, including intended audience, of
> each document to be developed. Include a priority
> for development.
>*For each document, identification of the following major
> players: document author
> blessor of content outline
> SMEs
> TA reviewers
>*Specification of the tool(s) used to develop the documentation.
>*Specification of how reviews are conducted (on paper, electronically),
> and the amount of time reviewers will be allowed (three working
> days for 1-50 pages, five working days for 51-100 pages ...).
> Also include the "rules" surrounding reviews; some companies,
> for example, will accept non-response as tacit approval; others
> won't.
>*A document development timeline, tied to product development
> milestones.
>*A contract (yes, CONTRACT) to be signed by the major players
> which supplies deliverables and receivables. This contract
> should detail what you need to be supplied with (product
> specs, test plans, access to alpha and beta product, yada-yada)
> and at what intervals (access to alpha software and test bed
> 30 working days before first draft deliverable). It should then
> specify your output (alpha doc, beta doc, yada-yada).
>I'm sure there are other things that can be included, but I
>feel these are the basics.
>Good luck - and don't fear a doc plan. It could end up being
>your best friend.
> Anne Halsey
> ahalsey -at- systemone -dot- net
> ----------
>From: Misti Tucker
>To: TECHWR-L
>Subject: Documentation Plan
>Date: Wednesday, October 16, 1996 10:30AM
>I'm embarking on a 112 hour documentation project that entails a
>creature >h>h>h document type I've never had to produce before: a
>documentation plan.
>I have some ideas, but in the interest of doing my best, if you could
>share some of your thoughts on what belongs in a document plan, I'd
>appreciate it. Thanks.
>*******************************************************************
>Misti Tucker
>Technical Consultant/ Communication Specialist
>Software Services Corporation
>Ann Arbor, Michigan (800)
>448-1568
>*******************************************************************
>My opinions do not in any way represent those of my employer.