TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Bullets (#117749) From:wburns -at- MICRON -dot- COM Date:Mon, 6 Jan 1997 14:50:02 MST
Sorry. Sent this without my sig.
Bill Burns
Assembly Documentation Supervisor
wburns -at- micron -dot- com
-----------------------------------------
This message brought to you by W.A.S.T.E.
and your local potsmaster.
-----------------------------------------
6-JAN-1997 14:45:54.29
>From: TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU
>To: TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU
>Subj: Re: Bullets (#116525)
>
>Lisa writes:
>
>>
>>This may be an easy question for others to answer, but my colleague and
>>I have a disagreement regarding bullets.
>>
>>If you are using bullets to list instructions (in complete sentences)
>>should you put a period at the end of those bulleted sentences?
>>
>
>We end independent clauses with periods when the clauses serve as vertical
>list items. I've heard some online documentation designers suggest minimizing
>end punctuation to avoid distractions, but I'm not convinced that a period at
>the end of a sentence is all that distracting.
>
>I have seen some examples of list items punctuated like serial lists (that is,
a
>comma after the first and intermediate items and a period following the last
>item). With noun phrases, I find this rendundant because the white space in a
>vertical list supplies enough visual separation. With independent clauses, it
>simply strikes me as odd (although it's often done with compound sentences with
>more than two clauses).
>
> TECHWR-L (Technical Communication) List Information: To send a message
>to 2500+ readers, e-mail to TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU -dot- Send commands
> to LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU (e.g. HELP or SIGNOFF TECHWR-L).
> Search the archives at http://www.documentation.com/ or search and
>browse the archives at http://listserv.okstate.edu/archives/techwr-l.html
>
>
TECHWR-L (Technical Communication) List Information: To send a message
to 2500+ readers, e-mail to TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU -dot- Send commands
to LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU (e.g. HELP or SIGNOFF TECHWR-L).
Search the archives at http://www.documentation.com/ or search and
browse the archives at http://listserv.okstate.edu/archives/techwr-l.html
