Years(') of experience

[geoff-h -at- MTL -dot- FERIC -dot- CA]

 One thing to remember is that some phrases, such as "2
 years [or years'] experience", are idiomatic, and thus
 immune to analysis logic and grammar. Grammatically, it
 would probably be "2 years' experience" because, as others
 have noted, it is "the experience of [possessed by] two
 years". It's still an awkard phrase.

 If all else fails, and the wording still looks odd to you,
 it's probably best to reword so that it doesn't look odd.
 Something like "I have 2 years of experience..." or "I have
 worked for 2 years on..." would work on a resume. To tie
 this in with the resume thread, you should _always_ reword
 something if you're aware of issues such as these; you
 might be grammatically correct, but if the interviewer
 doesn't think so, it's a pyrrhic victory. Moreover,
 choosing a grammatically debatable phrase over a simpler
 and clearer wording doesn't really showcase your writing
 talents.

 --Geoff Hart     @8^{)}     geoff-h -at- mtl -dot- feric -dot- ca
 Disclaimer: Speaking for myself, not FERIC.

 TECHWR-L (Technical Communication) List Information: To send a message
to 2500+ readers, e-mail to TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU -dot-  Send commands
   to LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU (e.g. HELP or SIGNOFF TECHWR-L).
  Search the archives at http://www.documentation.com/  or search and
browse the archives at http://listserv.okstate.edu/archives/techwr-l.html