Re: why bytes are Bs and not bs

Subject: Re: why bytes are Bs and not bs
From: Matt Ion <soundy -at- NEXTLEVEL -dot- COM>
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 1997 09:31:13 -0800

On Thu, 12 Jun 1997 10:40:53 -0400, Ridder, Fred wrote:

>In other words, "ton"
>is a terribly ambiguous unit of measurement unless the context
>is absolutely clear.

Didn't the metric ton used to be spelled "tonne"? When did this
change? Seems to me a rather simple way of separating it from the
riff-raff.



Your friend and mine,
Matt
<insert standard disclaimer here>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Having is not so pleasing a thing as wanting;
it is not logical, but it is often true.
- Spock

TECHWR-L (Technical Communication) List Information: To send a message
to 2500+ readers, e-mail to TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU -dot- Send commands
to LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU (e.g. HELP or SIGNOFF TECHWR-L).
Search the archives at http://www.documentation.com/ or search and
browse the archives at http://listserv.okstate.edu/archives/techwr-l.html


Previous by Author: Re: Jewelbox booklets?
Next by Author: Re: slashes, UNIX, and Windows
Previous by Thread: Re: why bytes are Bs and not bs
Next by Thread: Re: Frame 4 vs Frame 5


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads