TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Scientific vs. Humanistic From:Barb Philbrick <caslonsvcs -at- IBM -dot- NET> Date:Thu, 10 Jul 1997 15:01:39 GMT
If you are using "percent" enough times in a paragraph to prefer %,
maybe the information should be presented in a table instead.
I tend to view % vs. percent as a formal vs. casual issue, rather than
scientific vs. humanistic. If the document is to be user-friendly, I
might tend toward %. In a document like yours, which seems formal, I'd
use percent.
Have you checked GPO? I'd take their recommendation over any others if
this is a government report.
Barb
>My question is about using the % symbol vs. spelling out "percent" in a
>report to Congress from the US Army about the efficiency of a computer
>program. I'd prefer to use the % symbol because it appears so many times
>in some paragraphs when referring to the accuracy of the information
>produced by the program. So could such a report be considered
>"scientific"?
Barbara Philbrick, Caslon Services Inc.
Technical Writing
TECHWR-L (Technical Communication) List Information: To send a message
to 2500+ readers, e-mail to TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU -dot- Send commands
to LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU (e.g. HELP or SIGNOFF TECHWR-L).
Search the archives at http://www.documentation.com/ or search and
browse the archives at http://listserv.okstate.edu/archives/techwr-l.html
