Contents at a Glance

Subject: Contents at a Glance
From: Salan Pazurik <salstu -at- SMARTT -dot- COM>
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 1997 00:00:28 -0700

Is there any merit to providing two tables of contents--a "Contents at a
Glance" and "Contents in Detail"?
I notice that many software manuals do this, and am wondering if it
actually adds to usability or adds to confusion.
I have a 300-page procedures manual. It contains about 200 procedures
divided into four tabbed sections in a ring binder.
The table of contents extends over six pages. Should I place a one-page
Contents in Brief before the Contents in Detail?
(My first question to the list after seven months of listening.)

TECHWR-L (Technical Communication) List Information: To send a message
to 2500+ readers, e-mail to TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU -dot- Send commands
to LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU (e.g. HELP or SIGNOFF TECHWR-L).
Search the archives at http://www.documentation.com/ or search and
browse the archives at http://listserv.okstate.edu/archives/techwr-l.html


Previous by Author: CatBase Info Needed
Next by Author: Contents at a Glance
Previous by Thread: Re: Non-Competition and Integrity
Next by Thread: Re: Contents at a Glance


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads