TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Tracy Boyington took issue with the phrase "flattening the
learning curve" because <<if you picture a graph with time
on one axis and amount learned on the other, you'd see that
a steep learning curve means you learn a lot in a short
amount of time.>>
Not necessarily... the graph usually has "total knowledge"
rather than "amount learned" on the axis. In that context,
the steepness of the curve depends on the delta-y (vertical
difference between the amount of knowledge at the start and
end of the learning process. So if you hold time constant,
and decrease delta-y, the curve becomes flatter, but
learning time remains the same. Here, the important point
is to note that the amount of knowledge doesn't change
greatly, so if you accept that it's easier to learn a
little bit than it is to learn a lot, the metaphor makes
sense: all that changes is the amount of effort involved,
and that's the real intention of the metaphor.
That doesn't mean it's a particularly good metaphor; in
fact, as Tracy points out and my explanation demonstrates,
it's something of a mixed metaphor because it confuses the
amount of knowledge, learning time, and learning
difficulty. I suspect that the original metaphor was
something like pushing a load up a hill: the steeper the
hill (the curve), the more effort you expend. That just
further confuses the issue.
<<it sounds to me like he's saying flattening the curve
means people learn faster. And everybody says this...
everybody says a program that's hard to learn has a "steep
learning curve.">>
The problem with idiom is that it's created and spread by
the masses and not by some qualified linguistic authority.
Thus, as Tracy notes, the phrase has acquired two somewhat
contradictory meanings: faster learning, and easier
learning. Ideally, both are true, but that's not
necessarily the case (e.g., something like MSWord is easy
to learn but takes a long time to master; something like
_basic_ HTML can be hard to learn, but relatively easy to
master once you're past that initial learning). In any
event, "learning curves" are pretty much a useless cliche:
why not simply (and far more clearly) say "decreases
learning time" or "makes learning easier" or both?
--Geoff Hart @8^{)} geoff-h -at- mtl -dot- feric -dot- ca
Disclaimer: Speaking for myself, not FERIC.
TECHWR-L (Technical Communication) List Information: To send a message
to 2500+ readers, e-mail to TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU -dot- Send commands
to LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU (e.g. HELP or SIGNOFF TECHWR-L).
Search the archives at http://www.documentation.com/ or search and
browse the archives at http://listserv.okstate.edu/archives/techwr-l.html