TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:In defense of Word From:David Rapport <dave -at- NETMEDIA -dot- NET -dot- IL> Date:Wed, 13 Aug 1997 11:28:44 +0200
In this morning's digest (while I was still digesting my corn flakes) I was
surprised to read the following:
>I am relieved to read that the master doc concept may have been
>rehabilitated for the "97" edition of MS Word, but I am shocked to find
>that despite chatty, flying paper clips and other new "features"
>Microsoft didn't see fit to address what I consider a major oversight.
>Use ZOOM in Pageview to see two pages at a time, and you CAN'T see
>facing pages together [even # on the left, yeah?]. I can't think of any
>reason I'd _want_ to see two pages at a time other than to see the
>layout of the "spread," and here they've fixed it so that you see pages
>1 & 2, 3 & 4, and so on [odd # on the left]. Idiotic. What were they
>thinking, if indeed they _were_ thinking?
>So now here's the latest version of the software, and the "feature"
>still works that way. This is the sort of thing for which people get
>chased up windmills by torch & pitchfork wielding peasants. Yes, I know,
>the quick-fix is to temporarily add a blank page between pages 1 & 2,
>but why should I have to?
>MS Word nicely comports with Herron's Law of Software: "The lower the
>list price, the better it works."
>Torches and pitchforks, anyone?
I think oversight is only on the part of the poster. I don't know what
Herron says about that.
In my experience, if I select "different odd and even headers/footers" in
Page Setup|Layout and then zoom in Print Preview to "two pages" I have the
odd pages on the right and the evens on the left.
Can anyone confirm this? Scott, please let me know if your mileage varies.
PS Despite a recent thread I don't have a clue whether or not I got my caps
and quote marks correct.