Re: FW: "Conventions Used in this Manual" wasRE: Emphasis

Subject: Re: FW: "Conventions Used in this Manual" wasRE: Emphasis
From: Sabahat Ashraf <sabahat_ashraf -at- MENTORG -dot- COM>
Date: Fri, 5 Sep 1997 12:17:46 EDT

On Sep 5, 11:15am, Wohlrab Arleta - DRACS wrote:

> I agree that users should not have to go to a Conventions section to
> decipher fonts, graphics, etc., but I think it's too much to assume that
> no one needs such a section.

Dare I add that sometimes it is just useful to have for yourself, the writer;
helps us do our own thang right.

Sabahat.

--
Sabahat_Ashraf -at- MentorG -dot- com
------------------------------------------------------------------------
"... of course, I am way out of line."
-- Jay Leno

TECHWR-L (Technical Communication) List Information: To send a message
to 2500+ readers, e-mail to TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU -dot- Send commands
to LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU (e.g. HELP or SIGNOFF TECHWR-L).
Search the archives at http://www.documentation.com/ or search and
browse the archives at http://listserv.okstate.edu/archives/techwr-l.html


Previous by Author: Re: Links in email
Next by Author: Re: MCSE
Previous by Thread: FW: "Conventions Used in this Manual" wasRE: Emphasis
Next by Thread: US, CA, Mission Viejo: Technical Writers needed


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads