TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Parataxis? Does it take a paradigms? From:Edward Schaperjahn <schaperjahne -at- NIMO -dot- COM> Date:Mon, 15 Sep 1997 12:04:00 -0400
>>Yes, yes, yes! I see it all the time and in most cases, the words 'model'
>>or 'example' would do. The only word that makes my butt squinch more is
>>"proactive." Just looking at both words on the same page is bringing on
>>waves of butt squinching--not to mention nausea.
>
>BUT, without a proactive paradigm to paraphrase parataxis-paralyzed
>paragraphs, you'd par-obably partake of parboiled parabolic parenteral
>parfuscations. Perfunctorily, or perhaps perversely,,, p-p-pardon me?
Oh no! Just when I was getting the Peter Piper-thing down.
Ed Schaperjahn
TECHWR-L (Technical Communication) List Information: To send a message
to 2500+ readers, e-mail to TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU -dot- Send commands
to LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU (e.g. HELP or SIGNOFF TECHWR-L).
Search the archives at http://www.documentation.com/ or search and
browse the archives at http://listserv.okstate.edu/archives/techwr-l.html
