Re: Speaking of Improper Terminology

Subject: Re: Speaking of Improper Terminology
From: David Dvorkin <dvorkin -at- BOLIX -dot- COM>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 1997 14:45:47 -0600

Hillary Russak wrote:

>No flames here. I must agree that sensitivity should guide us in these
>matters. The language is happily huge enough to provide plenty of
>less-loaded language. (I even flinch at the "slave cylinder" in my shop
>manual.)

There's sensitivity, and then there's silliness -- or to be charitable,
hypersensitivity.

Slavery has existed throughout history, in various cultures and with
various races playing the role of master. One can abhor that history
without feeling the need to impoverish the language.

David Dvorkin
Qualix Group, Inc.
Boulder Development Ctr.
mailto:dvorkin -at- bolix -dot- com

TECHWR-L (Technical Communication) List Information: To send a message
to 2500+ readers, e-mail to TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU -dot- Send commands
to LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU (e.g. HELP or SIGNOFF TECHWR-L).
Search the archives at http://www.documentation.com/ or search and
browse the archives at http://listserv.okstate.edu/archives/techwr-l.html


Previous by Author: Re: Speaking of Improper Terminology
Next by Author: Re: Speaking of Improper Terminology
Previous by Thread: Re: Speaking of Improper Terminology
Next by Thread: Re: Speaking of Improper Terminology


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads