Re: Master/Slave

Subject: Re: Master/Slave
From: Wayne Douglass <wayned -at- VERITY -dot- COM>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 1997 14:16:45 -0700

At 04:07 PM 9/17/97 -0500, David Orr wrote plaintively:

>Maybe I'm just dense. Can someone explain why slave/master analogies are
>per se insensitive?

Nothing is *ever* insensitive per se. Thinking makes it so.

--Wayne
---------------------------------------------
Wayne Douglass phone: 408-542-2139
Verity, Inc. FAX: 408-542-2040
894 Ross Road mailto:wayned -at- verity -dot- com
Sunnyvale, CA 94089 http://www.verity.com
"Connecting People With Information"
---------------------------------------------

TECHWR-L (Technical Communication) List Information: To send a message
to 2500+ readers, e-mail to TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU -dot- Send commands
to LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU (e.g. HELP or SIGNOFF TECHWR-L).
Search the archives at http://www.documentation.com/ or search and
browse the archives at http://listserv.okstate.edu/archives/techwr-l.html


Previous by Author: Re: Speaking of Improper Terminology
Next by Author: Re: Master/Slave
Previous by Thread: Master/Slave
Next by Thread: Re: Master/Slave


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads