Re: Speaking of Improper Terminology

Subject: Re: Speaking of Improper Terminology
From: Matt Ion <soundy -at- ROGERS -dot- WAVE -dot- CA>
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 1997 08:14:01 -0800

On Thu, 18 Sep 1997 05:13:17 -0500, Buck and Tilly Buchanan wrote:

>> Well, you could just go with SCSI... hard to get negative meanings from
>> ID numbers 0 through 7.
>
>Quite the contrary, Matt. Certain ethnic groups absolutely MUST BE NUMBER
>ONE. They would be offended.

Well, heaven forbid they be number zero.. the BOOT DRIVE ;-)

Of course, any first-year comp-sci student knows that ID 7 has the
highest priority... they're more than welcome to ID 1... <radfc>

Your friend and mine,
Matt
<insert standard disclaimer here>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

It is impossible to rightly govern the world
without God and the Bible.
- George Washington

TECHWR-L (Technical Communication) List Information: To send a message
to 2500+ readers, e-mail to TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU -dot- Send commands
to LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU (e.g. HELP or SIGNOFF TECHWR-L).
Search the archives at http://www.documentation.com/ or search and
browse the archives at http://listserv.okstate.edu/archives/techwr-l.html


Previous by Author: Re: Speaking of Improper Terminology
Next by Author: Re: Proper use of the language
Previous by Thread: Re: Speaking of Improper Terminology
Next by Thread: Re[2]: Speaking of Improper Terminology


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads