Re: Re[2]: Master/Slave

Subject: Re: Re[2]: Master/Slave
From: Ann Mackenzie <AnnMacknz -at- AOL -dot- COM>
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 1997 10:28:01 -0400

In a message dated 97-09-23 03:52:03 EDT, cmartin -at- SEEKERSOFT -dot- COM (Chuck
Martin) writes:

<< In general, we do not lose communications efficiency because we aviod
words
with negative connotations. Often, we gain efficiency because the words we
*do* choose are clear in their meaning, not muddied by the potential of
multiple contexts or emotional meanings.
>>
Hear, hear. Well said, Chuck.

TECHWR-L (Technical Communication) List Information: To send a message
to 2500+ readers, e-mail to TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU -dot- Send commands
to LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU (e.g. HELP or SIGNOFF TECHWR-L).
Search the archives at http://www.documentation.com/ or search and
browse the archives at http://listserv.okstate.edu/archives/techwr-l.html


Previous by Author: Re: word abuse
Next by Author: HTML based help
Previous by Thread: Re: Re[2]: Master/Slave
Next by Thread: Re: Re[2]: Master/Slave


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads