TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Political Correctness and the Writer From:Pete Kloppenburg <pkloppen -at- CERTICOM -dot- COM> Date:Mon, 29 Sep 1997 16:20:07 -0400
Matt asks the leading questions:
> Are these people "victims" (eg. "MS victim" - good for the
> sympathy play)? Are they "suffering from" their
disease/condition/disability
> (also good where sympathy is needed or desired)? Or are they "survivors"
> (which to me sounds rather condescending)? Or should things be worded
such
> that they simply "have" their disease/condition/whatever?
Two ways a pernicious (like my own, frankly) mind could undermine
current terminology:
1) The "differently abled" term now in vogue could be construed to
suggest that that guy in the wheel chair there can do certain things
I can't, like efficiently factor large integers or spin straw into gold.
2) The "people with <fill in your medical condition of choice>" arose
mostly from resistence of AIDS patients to being called "victims"
- they are now almost always termed "people with AIDS". Perhaps
we should now also avoid the term "earthquake victims" and
instead refer to them as "people with earthquakes."
You can say I'm being an asshole here. But how long did it take
for "challenged" to become a quick and easy putdown?
In five years these terms will look as outdated in your writing as
"disabled", "crippled", "mentally retarded", or any other
discredited terminology. As a matter of principle I would be loathe
to play along by using them.
*BUT* I don't have to write for that audience for my current job.
And I guess that matters of principle have little weight when
your audience seems to be dead set on a particular way of
saying something.
Pete
Pete Kloppenburg - pkloppen -at- certicom -dot- com
Technical Writer
Certicom Corp
Mississauga, Ontario,
Canada http://www.certicom.com
TECHWR-L (Technical Communication) List Information: To send a message
to 2500+ readers, e-mail to TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU -dot- Send commands
to LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU (e.g. HELP or SIGNOFF TECHWR-L).
Search the archives at http://www.documentation.com/ or search and
browse the archives at http://listserv.okstate.edu/archives/techwr-l.html