TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:FW: Editing as a career? From:JGREY <JGREY -at- MADE2MANAGE -dot- COM> Date:Wed, 14 Jan 1998 08:23:16 -0500
> Ron Rhodes wrote: One day I hope to be an editor at a major publisher.
>
> Here's my story, sad but true; this is one data point and YMMV.
>
> My experience is that publishers do not view the editorial process as
> adding value - it is strictly as a cost, a necessary evil.
> Time-to-market is king, which means that the editor is viewed as a
> *hindrance* to getting the book to market. And of course profits are
> paper-thin (pardon the pun) so what you pay the editor comes right out
> of the bottom line. Hence, low salaries and intense pressure.
>
> In the computer-book publishing industry, in which I once worked,
> positions are structured such that the more esteemed editorial
> positions are largely project management jobs. As an underpaid
> Project Editor, I schlepped manuscripts from the author (who mostly
> cared about when his next check was coming) to a vastly underpaid copy
> editor to a vastly underpaid page layout person to a vastly underpaid
> proofreader, responding to inevitable crises at every turn. I seldom
> had time to actually edit - I had too many projects to manage. When I
> was promoted to Development Editor (where I was still underpaid), I
> gained a little more contact with text, but my charge was to make sure
> the author was on track at a high level, not to help him or her
> communicate effectively. The copy editor and proofreader had the
> greatest contact with text, but pay was *so* low and time was *so*
> short that the best they could do with a bad manuscript was fix the
> most egregious problems and send it on up the line.
>
> I'm sure you've experienced the stress of finishing the docs in time
> for them to ship with the product when it is released. Imagine that
> kind of deadline stress on a weekly basis. That was my experience in
> publishing. I had the equivalent of a major product release *every
> week*.
>
> Now that I've safely returned to the comparatively low-stress world of
> documenting computer software, I occasionally do freelance work for
> the computer-book publishing industry. I have a lot of fun dabbling
> in editing in this way.
>
> I'd also like to point out that my time in publishing built character
> like no other job I've ever had. I'm a much more efficient and
> thorough worker now than I ever was before because the breakneck pace
> in publishing made me rise to the challenge. But there's no way I'd
> go back to the low pay and high stress.
>
> Peace,
> jim
>
> jim grey \ Documentation Project Manager
> Made2Manage Systems, Inc. \ jgrey -at- made2manage -dot- com
>
>