TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Writing samples: what to look for From:"Bergen, Jane" <janeb -at- ANSWERSOFT -dot- COM> Date:Mon, 19 Jan 1998 14:03:27 -0600
Aside from the obvious grammar, spelling, concise/tight writing, and
clarity, I'd look for the following traits:
- Good use of devices - bullet lists where appropriate; single
instructions set clearly apart from paragraph text; number lists where
appropriate; handling of notes, warnings, etc.
- Appropriate chunking of information with clear and intelligent
headings
- Proper indexing
- Good navigation for reader: chapter summaries, intelligent
cross-referencing, general order of presentation
- Intelligent formatting (headers, footers, chapter front layout, use of
graphics, etc. (Of course, I would be sure to inquire whether the writer
had control over this element. In some organizations, the writer must
turn over his or her work to someone else for the "desktop publishing."
If the writer said that this was done by someone else, I would query him
or her long on hard on why and how he or she would change things.)
In my not-so-humble opinion, these things can set apart someone who can
merely write from someone who really, really understands the needs of
the reader and the difference in technical writing versus simple
non-fiction writing. They are also things that I do NOT have TIME to
teach someone on the job.
Hope this also helps some new writers see what things to check for in
their own work. This question should lead to some good discussion.
Jane
Jane Bergen, Technical Writer,
AnswerSoft, Inc. Richardson, TX
(972) 997-8355
janeb -at- answersoft -dot- com
On Monday, January 19, 1998 11:38 AM, Rebecca Rachmany
[SMTP:purple -at- NETMEDIA -dot- NET -dot- IL] wrote:
> Hi Techwhirlers:
>
> I am writing an article for my company newsletter about what to look
for in
> writing samples when interviewing technical writers. (The newsletter
is
> distributed to our customers and can also be viewed at our web site.)
>
> I have a lot of good ideas about what to write, but I can always use
more
> input. What do you look for when you review portfolios of job
candidates?
> What things are musts and what are nice-to-haves? What makes alarms go
off
> immediately to tell you someone is not qualified?
>
> Rebecca Rachmany
> General Manager
> TECH-TAV technical and end-user documentation
> P.O. Box 2419, Tel Aviv 61024
> purple -at- netmedia -dot- net -dot- il
>http://www.tech-tav.com
>
>
>
> Send commands to listserv -at- listserv -dot- okstate -dot- edu (e.g., SIGNOFF
TECHWR-L)
> Search archives at: http://listserv.okstate.edu/archives/techwr-l.html,