TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
"I hear and I forget, I see and I forget, I do and I forget" -- confused.
On Tue, 10 Mar 1998, Walker, Arlen P wrote:
>
>
> If you imagine that your product will be used by a wide range of
> people then PDF is certainly not the way to go. The days of PDF have
> come and quickly gone. I don't know anyone who has acrobat on their
> machines anymore,
>
> I know hundreds. So what's your point? That *you* don't use Acrobat so no
> one does?
>
> If you want to make is as difficult as possible for your users to
> get help...then by all means go with PDF.
>
> I find Acrobat to be faster and easier than a web browser for local file
> access. It also consumes far less memory than the browsers I keep around.
> In addition, it's far more stable. Give me a choice for viewing a local doc
> and I'll take PDF every time.
>
> The only time I miss the control a browser gives me over the page is when I
> encounter a bad design. And I encounter bad design far more often in HTML
> than in PDF. I don't want to spend my time tweaking your design to make it
> usable. I want to read it and be done with it.
>
> PDF excels at keeping things simple, at presenting the information cleanly
> and clearly. HTML, using any realistic number of illustrations, will result
> in many small files, which given the cluster sizes on most people's hard
> drives today, will waste a ton of disc space. (Not to mention that a user
> seems far more likely, in my experience, to blow away or otherwise mangle
> one or more small files than a single big one.)
>
> To my mind, HTML over the net is useful; local HTML files mean a lazy
> designer.
>
>
> Have fun,
> Arlen
> Chief Managing Director In Charge, Department of Redundancy Department
> DNRC 224
>
> Arlen -dot- P -dot- Walker -at- JCI -dot- Com
> ----------------------------------------------
> In God we trust; all others must provide data.
> ----------------------------------------------
> Opinions expressed are mine and mine alone.
> If JCI had an opinion on this, they'd hire someone else to deliver it.
>
>