Re: A direct attack on TW? -Reply

Subject: Re: A direct attack on TW? -Reply
From: Tracy Boyington <tracy_boyington -at- OKVOTECH -dot- ORG>
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 1998 15:40:09 -0500

> Even McDonald=27s and Burger King don=27t openly use the other franchise
> s name in their advertising...

Sure they do. Someone's ad says "the taste that beat the Whopper." A
Pepsi ad shows the Coke employee sneaking a Pepsi. It didn't happen 25
years ago, but they do it all the time now. As long as you're telling
the truth, you can use the competitor's product in your ad.

But what I'm thinking is... this other company's product is so complex
it needs its own special *keyboard*??? Sounds a little inconvenient to
me. Anyone else? Would the rest of the world prefer a special keyboard
to a 50-page manual? Would the rest of techwr-l even prefer it?

Tracy
--
===========================================================
Tracy Boyington mailto:tracy_boyington -at- okvotech -dot- org
Oklahoma Dept. of Vocational & Technical Education
Curriculum & Instructional Materials Center
Stillwater, Oklahoma http://www.okvotech.org/cimc/
===========================================================




Previous by Author: Automatic caption numbering in Word97 -- not updating
Next by Author: Re: Writers or what? WAS Word-processing or DTP
Previous by Thread: Re: A direct attack on TW?
Next by Thread: Re: A direct attack on TW? -Reply


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads