TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Re: WORD, A Word Processor. Was: The Tools Tech Writers Use
Subject:Re: WORD, A Word Processor. Was: The Tools Tech Writers Use From:GM Vick <gmv -at- NETCOM -dot- COM> Date:Mon, 3 Aug 1998 17:08:35 -0700
If your system didn't crash at over 20 MB, consider yourself blessed.
Just this afternoon, for nowhere near the first time, I crashed out of
Word97 while working in a particular 116 KILOBYTE file that is 10 pages of
tables and several instances of columns. I have 32 MB of RAM and a
Pentium. Usually I don't have this problem unless the file is greater than
15 MB or so, but Word just hates this little file.
G
On Mon, 3 Aug 1998, David Meadows wrote:
> [...]
> >times in basic functionality. The very concept that a program would
> become
> >unstable with
> >files a mere megabyte long -- 3% of a modest system's memory -- is
> >incredible. I'll bet [...]
>
>
> Just to even the score a little, I have found Word to be a remarkably
> robust word processor. I have routinely worked with files over 20
> megabytes long -- on what I considered a grossly under-specified
> machine -- and never experienced a system crash. Sure, it slows down a
> little at that size, but the machine was under-powered for the task.
>
> I must admit, my co-worker crashed Word and/or Windows several times a
> day while performing the same tasks. I have to wonder, though, how much
> is the fault of the tool and how much is the fault of the user? Maybe I
> have just been particularly lucky, but I prefer to think that my
> computer runs smoothly because I treat it right. Windows software is
> ridiculously complicated and is far from being zero-maintenance.
>
> >The rule of thumb is: "Only use Word on the documents you don't want to
> >keep."
>
> Hmmm... my rule of thumb is: "be good to Windows and it will be good to
> you".
>
> --
> David Meadows [ Technical Writer | Information Developer ]
> DNRC Minister for Littorasy * david -at- goldenheroes -dot- softnet -dot- co -dot- uk
> "Is not this the most reprehensible form of ignorance,
> that of thinking one knows what one does not know?"
> -- Socrates
>
> From ??? -at- ??? Sun Jan 00 00:00:00 0000==
>
>
>
>