Re: FWD: Bad employment situation advice needed

Subject: Re: FWD: Bad employment situation advice needed
From: Barbara Karst-Sabin <barbara -at- QUOTE -dot- COM>
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 1998 19:28:45 -0700

This sounds almost like my last contract. As for not getting a workable
product from the developers, I eventually delivered a markup for review
with deadlines set for its return and for engineering changes to make
the product stable and usable. The first reaction from the developers
was, "you can't set deadlines for us!" and my memo was forwarded to the
Chief Engineer.
That was my golden opportunity. When he wrote to me reiterating that
the Tech Pubs people couldn't set deadlines for the engineers, I simply
replied by giving him the deadlines my team was required to meet and
pointing out that this could not be done if his team was not held to
some corresponding deadlines. We soon had scheduled deliverables for
everyone concerned and everyone, including the developers, were held to
those deadlines. Don't know if that will work for you, but if you're in
the position of planning to leave anyway, what can it hurt???


As for the relocation expenses, you may be forced to reimburse your
current employer, but the working conditions might be extenuating
circumstances. Are you an STC member? They may provide some kind of
legal advice on these things. If all else fails, you can deduct them
from your income taxes (if it was a prior year, you'll have to file an
amended return), so it's not a total loss (although coming up with the
money now and waiting for the IRS to get around to making a refund may
be a bit difficult to weather, depending on the cost of your move). It
cost me $8000.00 when I moved back to California from the East Coast!!!

BJ

Good Luck!

Eric J. Ray wrote:
>
> Name withheld upon request. Please reply on list.
>
> *************************************************
>
> I need some advice on a pretty thorny employment situation. For me the
> question is not whether to quit this job, but when.
>
> Toward the end of last year I took a job as lead technical writer on a
> complex software development and localization effort. I work with a group
> of developers who are localizing the software, and they depend on another
> group of developers to supply the base set of functions and upgrade them.
>
> There are two sets of documentation requirements: one for the base set of
> functions, and one for the localized modifications. The base documentation
> is not in good shape, requiring lots of updating as well as editing
> translated English. There are three writers on the project (for both sets),
> and the base documentation consists of about 1500 pages documenting the
> various software components. The documentation of the software?s localized
> modifications would be in addition to this.
>
> The problem is with the base development group, which cannot seem to
> deliver a version of the product stable enough to document or develop from.
> No one in the management hierarchy I work under exercises any control over
> this group--either they can?t or they won?t. New releases of the base
> software are accepted without regard to software quality assurance.
> Developers are expected to produce working modifications off of this.
> Nobody seems to be able to refuse releases from the base group until they
> are stable. Project management expects a functioning version of the
> localized software, with documentation, by the end of the year. Lately,
> developers have been quitting the project at the rate of one every two
> weeks.
>
> If you?re not laughing (or crying) by now, there?s more. My employer was
> originally developing this software with a company having business
> expertise in the software application, but they ?fired? us. The project
> manager who hired me was fired in part for his inability to set a direction
> for the documentation group. This hardly improved the situation, though,
> because since then I have produced information plans at the request of
> management every few months or so, which are approved and then scrapped a
> few months later when management decides to re-direct the documentation
> effort. Arguing with them about how it?s better to set a course and stick
> with it does no good. Of course, very little gets done, and then I am held
> accountable for this.
>
> The problem with quitting is that because I was relocated for the position,
> I?m liable to reimburse this employer for relocation costs since I signed
> an agreement to that effect. The agreement expires in a few months, and I
> suppose I could hang on, but I?m sick of being miserable here and I may
> have the opportunity to accept an offer from a quality organization with
> better pay and benefits shortly.
>
> Can anyone advise me on the enforceability of the relocation reimbursement
> agreement, how likely it is they will hold me to it, or how I can get out
> of it given the ridiculous circumstances? Is there a way to broach the
> subject without giving away my plans? I?m tempted to quit without giving
> notice since I?m quite sure they will screw me out of two weeks? pay, in
> accord with HR policies regarding resignation by relocated individuals.
>
> I?d be interested in hearing about what you would do in this situation.
> Needless to say I?ve learned a lot from this experience about how to
> interview a company before accepting an offer. Thanks for your advice.
>
> From ??? -at- ??? Sun Jan 00 00:00:00 0000==

From ??? -at- ??? Sun Jan 00 00:00:00 0000=




Previous by Author: Re: FWD: SONATA = Situation ON Allocating Time for Additionalities
Next by Author: Re: purpose of arrows --> (was Insert-->Arrow...)
Previous by Thread: Re: FWD: Bad employment situation advice needed
Next by Thread: Re: Bad employment situation advice needed


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads