Re: Volume to Internet: was Re: Posting Ken Starr's report to the Internet

[RRobbins <robbie_robbins -at- YAHOO -dot- COM>]

200 staffers to convert a document to be readable on-screen?  Wow
thats expensive!  There has to be a better way..
Take a look at this at this Trellix document and if you like what you
see contact me to get more info.

--RR
robbie_robbins -at- yahoo -dot- com


http://www.trellix.com/icreport/

Dan Bricklin's comments:
The Internet is about more than fast dissemination of information --
it also holds the promise of helping people more effectively navigate
through information to form their own opinions.

The Trellix version has the following benefits:

While reading the report, the reader can refer to footnotes in a
separate window without losing context.

An overview map allows the reader to see the overall structure of the
document to remain oriented and to navigate to specific sections.

The side border allows the reader to easily link to sections and
subsections of the document as needed.

Organizations interested in hosting this version are welcome to do so
free of charge. Contact us (it's about 750 files, totaling about 3MB).



---Damien Braniff <Damien_Braniff -at- PAC -dot- CO -dot- UK> wrote:
>
> This is something that was raised at one of the sessions at the ISTC
> conference (UK) this weekend.  The talk was about different ways of
> sourcing text - paper, PDF, HTML etc.  One point raised was how
newspapers
> kept info up to date on the web and, basically, it's sheer numbers.
The
> example quoted was CNN who have 200+ staff whose sole job is to
update the
> online version.
>
> Damien Braniff
> Technical Author
> PAC International
>
>
>
 From ??? -at- ??? Sun Jan 00 00:00:00 0000=
> Send commands to listserv -at- listserv -dot- okstate -dot- edu (e.g., SIGNOFF
TECHWR-L)
>
>
>


_________________________________________________________
DO YOU YAHOO!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com


 From ??? -at- ??? Sun Jan 00 00:00:00 0000=