TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Matt's Dilemma - was Re: I got the bluuuuueeess From:howard <pencil -at- WAVENET -dot- CO -dot- UK> Date:Sun, 20 Sep 1998 23:54:17 +0100
C Davis wrote:
>Ok, so I can't sing =)I have to insert my 2 cents about Matt and his brush
>with depression.
<grin>If I remember his original post, he had taken very seriously an adage
aimed at making folks think. Was this adage written by a technical
communicator?
Hard, when spending your whole time composing pretty much factual, serious,
information products (I suspect even the dummies books have the humour
added-in after user-testing, but I don't *know* this) to not take others
seriously isn't it?
However I guess that if, like you, he's spending his time re-writing stuff
which could be pretty much automated (as I infer from your post) he's
justified in feeling a little worried.
What would I say? Relax! Dig out your early first drafts (ie, from 5 years
ago, 3 years ago and 18 months ago) and compare the comments/revisions
you're getting now with those you were getting then; how many you're
getting and what level they're at.
Then see if you've had 1 year's experience 5 times over.
Apart from that it seems a question we all have to answer for ourselves...